What evaluations do we review?

Our review focuses on evaluations that meet the following criteria:

Criteria	Remarks
Evaluative character	“The systematic and objective assessment of an on-going or completed project, programme or policy, its design, implementation, and results in relation to specified evaluation criteria.” (OECD/DAC) “Systematic and objective assessment” are defined in a fairly loose manner, as an organised assessment that includes efforts to reduce bias.
Evaluation context	International development and humanitarian interventions.
Types of interventions	Interventions explicitly tackling any form of VAWG, as the main or secondary purpose.
Language of the evaluation report	English.
Period	Evaluations completed in 2008 or later.
Publication status	Published and unpublished evaluations.

So far, as of 16 October 2013, our mix of web-search and snowballing via e-mail contacts and the social web has yielded more than 100 evaluation reports that meet our criteria. Our scoping phase ends in late October. If you happen to have an evaluation report that meets the criteria above, please forward it to the review team (click on the link to get to our address), possibly including e-mail addresses of the evaluator and the evaluation commissioners.